Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Nova Premier 1.0 leads Ministral 3 14B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 62.5x less per output token ($0.20 vs $12.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Premier 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.50
1
Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
1
vs boards won of 2 shared

Nova Premier 1.0 or Ministral 3 14B 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by Design Arena: websites, where it leads.

Shared results
2
Nova Premier 1.0 only
12
Ministral 3 14B 2512 only
5
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Premier 1.0 not benchmarked, Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 30.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Nova Premier 1.0 835 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 1081, 30.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Premier 1.0 $12.50 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 per million output tokens, 62.5x apart.
Context window
Nova Premier 1.0 takes 1M tokens, Ministral 3 14B 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Premier 1.0BarsMinistral 3 14B 2512Ties
Intelligence10
Web design01
All shared boards11
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
ALE-Bench147.4Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.26.0Nova Premier 1.0
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.1Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom38.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)56.9%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Math Index17.3Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)17.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites8351081Ministral 3 14B 2512
Design Arena: game devNot measured1037Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured989Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1064Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
IFBench36.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.0088Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.163Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.625Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Premier 1.0 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
SpecificationAmazon Nova Premier 1.0Mistral Ministral 3 14B 2512
MakerAmazonMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 31, 2025December 2, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.20
Output $/Mtok$12.50$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Ministral 3 14B 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by Design Arena: websites, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Nova Premier 1.0 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Premier 1.0 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Nova Premier 1.0, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Premier 1.0 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Premier 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Ministral 3 14B 2512's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next