Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Micro 1.0 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Micro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $0.14 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Nova Micro 1.0 is 2.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 2.1x less.

Shared results
0
Nova Micro 1.0 only
39
Mistral Small 3.2 24B only
5
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Micro 1.0 not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.2 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Nova Micro 1.0 $0.14 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.30 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Nova Micro 1.0 takes 128K tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 24B 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: coding1218Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1215Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.9Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.6%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1191Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expert1183Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1203Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: math1206Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1212Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)53.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
MMLU70.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science1210Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1207Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1221Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1182Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured896Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured888Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured929Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
IFBench29.4%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)13.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text1208Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1174Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1172Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English1224Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1186Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1209Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: German1192Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1154Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1150Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French1238Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1225Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1185Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1178Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1205Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1192Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1163Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0001Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0003Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0022Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0059Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0084Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.023Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Micro 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
SpecificationAmazon Nova Micro 1.0Mistral Small 3.2 24B
MakerAmazonMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024June 20, 2025
Context window128K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.035$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.14$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Micro 1.0 better than Mistral Small 3.2 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 2.1x less.

Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Micro 1.0 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Micro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.2 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next