Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Micro 1.0 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 33 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Nova Micro 1.0 Replace GLM 4.7 Flash
Nova Micro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
14.9
Output $/M
$0.40
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 2.9x less, and where what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Model ANova Micro 1.0AmazonNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGLM 4.7 FlashZ.aiNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
33
Nova Micro 1.0 only
6
GLM 4.7 Flash only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Micro 1.0 not benchmarked, GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 84.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Micro 1.0 14.0% against GLM 4.7 Flash 98.8%, 84.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Micro 1.0 $0.14 against GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Nova Micro 1.0 takes 128K tokens, GLM 4.7 Flash 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Micro 1.0BarsGLM 4.7 FlashTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%22.0%GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: coding12181382GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT12151389GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.914.9GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%98.8%GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.8%58.1%GLM 4.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.6%7.6%GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured60.5%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11911356GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert11831357GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12031369GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured58.3%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math12061355GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work12121369GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)53.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
MMLU70.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12101358GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12071343GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government12211357GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance11821343GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1194Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1208Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1135Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1123Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1121Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1178Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1038Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
IFBench29.4%60.8%GLM 4.7 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)13.0%41.7%GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text12081351GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following11741327GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing11721296GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: English12241373GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English11861330GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese12091403GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German11921336GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese1154Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean11501283GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: French12381332GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish12251350GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian11851333GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1291Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11781342GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries12051345GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language11921320GLM 4.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11631304GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0001Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0022Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0084Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Micro 1.0 and GLM 4.7 Flash
SpecificationAmazon Nova Micro 1.0Z.ai GLM 4.7 Flash
MakerAmazonZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024January 19, 2026
Context window128K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.035$0.0653
Output $/Mtok$0.14$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Micro 1.0 better than GLM 4.7 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 2.9x less, and where what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Micro 1.0 vs GLM 4.7 Flash comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Micro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 4.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next