Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Lite 1.0 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Nova Lite 1.0 costs 4.6x less per output token than Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($0.24 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Lite 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.24
0
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
23
vs boards won of 23 shared

Nova Lite 1.0 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 4.6x cheaper ($0.24 vs $1.10 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
23
Nova Lite 1.0 only
18
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
5
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 39.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Nova Lite 1.0 1201 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1447, 40.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 4.6x apart.
Context window
Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Lite 1.0BarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards023
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)16.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: coding12391473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT12411461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.7Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom17.5%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12201442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert12011447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12261451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: math12271459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12351475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
MMLU77.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12321430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12131376Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: legal and government12381433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance12191430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1253Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1233Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
IFBench34.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)19.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text12291425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following12051430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing11971390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision990Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English12431436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English12081413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese12251424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: German1229Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1153Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1153Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French12381461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1226Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12161412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: multi-turn11991414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries12341429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language12111400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11761399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: English999Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0002Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0037Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.014Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Lite 1.0 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationAmazon Nova Lite 1.0Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerAmazonReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024October 16, 2026
Context window300K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.06$0.35
Output $/Mtok$0.24$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 4.6x cheaper ($0.24 vs $1.10 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next