Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Lite 1.0 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

Nova Lite 1.0 leads Ministral 3 8B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 6.7 to 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B 2512 costs 1.6x less per output token ($0.15 vs $0.24 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Lite 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.24
1
Ministral 3 8B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Nova Lite 1.0 or Ministral 3 8B 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 262K tokens).

Shared results
1
Nova Lite 1.0 only
40
Ministral 3 8B 2512 only
6
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, Ministral 3 8B 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 1.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Nova Lite 1.0 6.7 against Ministral 3 8B 2512 5.5, 1.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against Ministral 3 8B 2512 $0.15 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Ministral 3 8B 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Lite 1.0BarsMinistral 3 8B 2512Ties
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured9.7Only Ministral 3 8B 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)16.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: coding1239Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1241Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.75.5Nova Lite 1.0
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.6Only Ministral 3 8B 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.5%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1220Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expert1201Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1226Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: math1227Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1235Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
MMLU77.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science1232Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1213Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1238Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1219Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1065Only Ministral 3 8B 2512 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured990Only Ministral 3 8B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1031Only Ministral 3 8B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1053Only Ministral 3 8B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
IFBench34.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)19.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text1229Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1205Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1197Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision990Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English1243Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1208Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1225Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: German1229Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1153Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1153Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French1238Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1226Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1216Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1199Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1234Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1211Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1176Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision: English999Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Ministral 3 8B 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0002Fits in one request
Ministral 3 8B 2512$0.0002Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0037Fits in one request
Ministral 3 8B 2512$0.0080Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.014Fits in one request
Ministral 3 8B 2512$0.032Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Lite 1.0 and Ministral 3 8B 2512
SpecificationAmazon Nova Lite 1.0Mistral Ministral 3 8B 2512
MakerAmazonMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024December 2, 2025
Context window300K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.06$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.24$0.15
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than Ministral 3 8B 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or Ministral 3 8B 2512?

Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Ministral 3 8B 2512 costs $0.15 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or Ministral 3 8B 2512?

Nova Lite 1.0, with 300K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Ministral 3 8B 2512's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next