Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Nova 2 Lite leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.4 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 8.3x less per output token ($0.30 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
1
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
28
vs boards won of 29 shared

Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova 2 Lite for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
29
Nova 2 Lite only
2
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
16
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 6.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Nova 2 Lite 1364 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 1432, 11.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding02
Intelligence10
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards128
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Coding Index23.0Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCodeNot measured33.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.1%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
ALE-Bench236.3Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding13851416Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT13941417Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.47.5Nova 2 Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured28.1%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured55.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641398Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: expert13591397Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13851406Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured66.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math13591394Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691411Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science13821393Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13861392Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government13591387Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance13691389Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBenchNot measured50.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured61.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
DTBenchNot measured67.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured22.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text13621384Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following13351363Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing12921317Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: English13851391Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: non-English13371372Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese13641432Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: German13431379Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese12731337Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Korean12811330Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: French13811419Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Spanish13751404Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Russian13421369Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Polish13271353Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381378Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries13351378Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language13181336Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13091334Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerAmazonQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025July 29, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.09
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova 2 Lite for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Nova 2 Lite, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next