Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads Nova 2 Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 13.4, and Nova 2 Lite costs 1.6x less per output token ($2.50 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
28
vs boards won of 28 shared

Nova 2 Lite or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 203K tokens).

Shared results
28
Nova 2 Lite only
3
GLM 5V Turbo only
37
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 15.5 points apart on average over 16 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Nova 2 Lite 1364 against GLM 5V Turbo 1491, 21.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General016
All shared boards028
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding Index23.0Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
ALE-Bench236.3Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding13851466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT13941460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.423.5GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1070Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1127Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.1%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert13591453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13851456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: math13591442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: science13821448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13861433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government13591436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance13691435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1218Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1228Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1151Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBenchNot measured61.1%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured70.3%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text13621437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following13351423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing12921417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English13851454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English13371420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese13641491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German13431422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Japanese1273Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean12811397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French13811443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish13751452GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian13421432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish13271432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries13351438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language13181420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13091407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerAmazonZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window1M203K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.20
Output $/Mtok$2.50$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 203K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or GLM 5V Turbo?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or GLM 5V Turbo?

Nova 2 Lite, with 1M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next