Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion 3.5 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs 1.5x less per output token than Aion 3.5 ($4.00 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion 3.5Aion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
vs $6.00 vs $4.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k is 1.5x cheaper.

Aion 3.5 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Aion 3.5 for a larger context window (262K against 16K tokens).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion 3.5 not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion 3.5 $6.00 against GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k $4.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Aion 3.5 takes 262K tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion 3.5$0.0060Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.0050Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion 3.5$0.168Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.162Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion 3.5$0.660Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.640Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion 3.5 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
SpecificationAionLabs Aion 3.5OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
MakerAion LabsOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 23, 2026August 28, 2023
Context window262K16K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$3.00
Output $/Mtok$6.00$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Aion 3.5 for a larger context window (262K against 16K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

Aion 3.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs $3.00 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion 3.5 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

Aion 3.5, with 262K tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion 3.5 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next