Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion 3.5 vs Nova Lite 1.0

Nova Lite 1.0 costs 25.0x less per output token than Aion 3.5 ($0.24 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion 3.5Aion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
Nova Lite 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.24
vs $6.00 vs $0.24 per 1M output tokens. Nova Lite 1.0 is 25.0x cheaper.

Aion 3.5 or Nova Lite 1.0: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion 3.5 has none yet; Nova Lite 1.0 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion 3.5 not benchmarked, Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion 3.5 $6.00 against Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
Aion 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Nova Lite 1.0 300K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured16.7%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.8%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1239Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1241Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured6.7Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured17.5%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.3%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.3%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1220Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1201Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1226Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured7.0Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured7.0%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1227Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1235Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured59.0%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
MMLUNot measured77.0%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1232Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1213Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1238Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1219Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
BenchmarkAion 3.5Nova Lite 1.0Leader
IFBenchNot measured34.1%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured19.0%Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1229Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1205Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1197Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured990Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1243Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1208Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1225Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1229Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1153Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1153Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1238Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1226Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1216Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1199Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1234Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1211Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1176Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured999Only Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion 3.5$0.0060Fits in one request
Nova Lite 1.0$0.0002Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion 3.5$0.168Fits in one request
Nova Lite 1.0$0.0037Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion 3.5$0.660Fits in one request
Nova Lite 1.0$0.014Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0
SpecificationAionLabs Aion 3.5Amazon Nova Lite 1.0
MakerAion LabsAmazon
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 23, 2026December 5, 2024
Context window262K300K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.06
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.24
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than Nova Lite 1.0 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or Nova Lite 1.0?

Aion 3.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 and $0.24. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion 3.5 or Nova Lite 1.0?

Nova Lite 1.0, with 300K tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion 3.5 and Nova Lite 1.0?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion 3.5 has none yet; Nova Lite 1.0 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next