Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion 3.5 Mini vs GLM 4.5V

Aion 3.5 Mini costs 1.3x less per output token than GLM 4.5V ($1.40 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion 3.5 MiniAion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.40
GLM 4.5VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
vs $1.40 vs $1.80 per 1M output tokens. Aion 3.5 Mini is 1.3x cheaper.

Aion 3.5 Mini or GLM 4.5V: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Aion 3.5 Mini for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($1.40 vs $1.80 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 66K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion 3.5 Mini has none yet; GLM 4.5V on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion 3.5 Mini not benchmarked, GLM 4.5V not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion 3.5 Mini $1.40 against GLM 4.5V $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Aion 3.5 Mini takes 262K tokens, GLM 4.5V 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured60.4%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1347Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1353Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured22.5%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.4%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.3%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1335Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1353Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1357Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1151Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1163Only GLM 4.5V measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured59.8%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured73.0Only GLM 4.5V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.0%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1354Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1336Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1330Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1349Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1338Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1309Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkAion 3.5 MiniGLM 4.5VLeader
IFBenchNot measured34.2%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena TextNot measured1333Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1311Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1294Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1154Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1362Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1303Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1337Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1336Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1298Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1302Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1333Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1305Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1302Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1303Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1183Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1151Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion 3.5 Mini$0.0014Fits in one request
GLM 4.5V$0.0015Fits in one request

Aion 3.5 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion 3.5 Mini$0.039Fits in one request
GLM 4.5V$0.035Fits in one request

GLM 4.5V costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion 3.5 Mini$0.154Fits in one request
GLM 4.5V$0.138Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5V costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V
SpecificationAionLabs Aion 3.5 MiniZ.ai GLM 4.5V
MakerAion LabsZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 23, 2026August 11, 2025
Context window262K66K
Input $/Mtok$0.70$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.40$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion 3.5 Mini better than GLM 4.5V for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Aion 3.5 Mini for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($1.40 vs $1.80 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 66K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 Mini or GLM 4.5V?

Aion 3.5 Mini costs $0.70 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; GLM 4.5V costs $0.60 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion 3.5 Mini or GLM 4.5V?

Aion 3.5 Mini, with 262K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion 3.5 Mini and GLM 4.5V?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion 3.5 Mini has none yet; GLM 4.5V on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next