Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion-3.0 vs Nova Micro 1.0

Nova Micro 1.0 costs 42.9x less per output token than Aion-3.0 ($0.14 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion-3.0Aion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
Nova Micro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.14
vs $6.00 vs $0.14 per 1M output tokens. Nova Micro 1.0 is 42.9x cheaper.

Aion-3.0 or Nova Micro 1.0: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Aion-3.0 for a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-3.0 has none yet; Nova Micro 1.0 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion-3.0 not benchmarked, Nova Micro 1.0 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion-3.0 $6.00 against Nova Micro 1.0 $0.14 per million output tokens, 42.9x apart.
Context window
Aion-3.0 takes 131K tokens, Nova Micro 1.0 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.5%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1218Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1215Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured5.9Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured14.0%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.8%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.6%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1191Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1183Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1203Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured6.0Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.0%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1206Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1212Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured53.1%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
MMLUNot measured70.8%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1210Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1207Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1221Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1182Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
BenchmarkAion-3.0Nova Micro 1.0Leader
IFBenchNot measured29.4%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured13.0%Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1208Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1174Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1172Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1224Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1186Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1209Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1192Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1154Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1150Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1238Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1225Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1185Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1178Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1205Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1192Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1163Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion-3.0$0.0060Fits in one request
Nova Micro 1.0$0.0001Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion-3.0$0.168Fits in one request
Nova Micro 1.0$0.0022Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion-3.0$0.660Exceeds the context window
Nova Micro 1.0$0.0084Exceeds the context window

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0
SpecificationAionLabs Aion-3.0Amazon Nova Micro 1.0
MakerAion LabsAmazon
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 7, 2026December 5, 2024
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.035
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.14
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion-3.0 better than Nova Micro 1.0 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Aion-3.0 for a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Aion-3.0 or Nova Micro 1.0?

Aion-3.0 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.035 and $0.14. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion-3.0 or Nova Micro 1.0?

Aion-3.0, with 131K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion-3.0 and Nova Micro 1.0?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-3.0 has none yet; Nova Micro 1.0 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next