Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion-2.0 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash costs 5.3x less per output token than Aion-2.0 ($0.30 vs $1.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion-2.0Aion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.60
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $1.60 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Step 3.5 Flash is 5.3x cheaper.

Aion-2.0 or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-2.0 has none yet; Step 3.5 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion-2.0 not benchmarked, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion-2.0 $1.60 against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens, 5.3x apart.
Context window
Aion-2.0 takes 131K tokens, Step 3.5 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1436Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1434Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured17.0Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.4%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.1%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured24.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1411Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1415Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1394Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkAion-2.0Step 3.5 FlashLeader
IFBenchNot measured66.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.0%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1403Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1357Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1417Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1446Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1405Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1353Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1351Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1419Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1389Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1404Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1372Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1360Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion-2.0$0.0016Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion-2.0$0.045Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion-2.0$0.176Exceeds the context window
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationAionLabs Aion-2.0StepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerAion LabsStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 23, 2026January 29, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.60$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion-2.0 better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Aion-2.0 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Aion-2.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion-2.0 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash, with 262K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion-2.0 and Step 3.5 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-2.0 has none yet; Step 3.5 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next